HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Keywords:
Cosmological argument, Principle of Sufficient Reason, Necessitarianism, Bradley’s regress, MonismAbstract
My aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)
is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason
(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, I
explain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately based
upon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modal
objection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulate
the CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral version
of the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond its
apparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,
embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us to
a form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how this
result ultimately undermines the CA itself (V).
References
ALMEIDA, M. “Cosmological Arguments”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2018.
AQUINAS, St. T. “Summa Theologica”. URL = http://corpusthomisticum.org/.
ARIEW, R. and G. GARBER (eds.). “G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays”. Indianapolis,IN: Hackett, 1989.
ARMSTRONG, D. M. “A World of State of Affairs”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
BAXTER, D. M. “Bradley on Substantive and Adjective: The Complex-Unity Problem”. In: W. J. MANDER (ed.), 1996. pp. 1-24.
BENNETT, J. “A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics”. Indianapolis, In: Hackett, 1984.
BLANSHARD, B. “Bradley on Relations”. In: A. MANSER, G. STOCK (eds.), 1984. pp. 211-226.
BLISS, R., K. TROGDON. “Metaphysical Grounding”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), E. N. ZALTA (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/ (last accessed on December 6th, 2021).
BRADLEY, F. H. “Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay”. 2d ed., 9th imp. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
______. “Collected Essays”. Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935.
______. “Essays on Truth and Reality”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914.
______. “Relations”. In: F. H. BRADLEY, 1935. pp. 629-676.
BRICEÑO, S. “Monismo, relaciones, y los límites de la explicación metafísica”. Trans/Form/Ação, 44, 2021, pp. 285-410.
CANDLISH, S. “The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy”. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
CRAIG, W. L. “The Cosmological Argument: From Plato to Leibniz”. Eugene, OR:Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001.
CURLEY, E. (ed.) “The Collected Writings of Spinoza”. Vol. 1. Trans. E. Curley.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
DASGUPTA, S. “Metaphysical Rationalism”. Noûs, 50, 2016, pp. 379-418.
DELLA ROCCA, M. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason”. Philosophical Topics, 31, 2003, pp. 75-93.
______. “PSR”. Philosophers’ Imprint, 10, 2010, pp. 1-13.
______. “Razing Structures to the Ground”. Analytic Philosophy, 55 (3), 2014, pp.276-294.
______. “The Parmenidean Ascent”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
______. “Rationalism, Idealism, Monism, and Beyond”. In: E. FÖRSTER, Y. MELAMED (eds.), 2012. pp. 7-26.
FÖRSTER, E., Y. MELAMED (eds.). “Spinoza and German Idealism”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
GALE, R. “On the Nature and Existence of God”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
GERSON, L. P. “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason”. Philosophy of Religion, 21, 1987, pp. 129-142.
HYLTON, P. “Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytical Philosophy”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
LEIBNIZ, G. W. “The Principles of Philosophy, or, the Monadology”. In: R. ARIEW, G. GARBER (eds.), 1989. pp. 213-225.
MACBRIDE, F. “Relations and Truthmaking II”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111, 2011, pp. 161-179.
MANDER, W. J. (ed.) “Perspectives on the Logic and Metaphysics of F. H. Bradley”. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996.
MANSER, A. and G. STOCK (eds.). “The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
MOORE, G. E. “External and Internal Relations”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society, 20, 1920, pp. 40-62.
PRUSS, A. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment”. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2006.
REICHENBACH, B. “Cosmological Argument”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), E. N. ZALTA (ed.). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/
archives/spr2021/entries/cosmological-argument/ (last accessed on December 6th, 2021).
______. “The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment”. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher,1972.
RORTY, R. “Relations, External and Internal”. In: The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Vol. 7, P. EDWARDS (ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1967. pp. 125-133.
ROWE, W. “Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction”. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2007.
______. “The Cosmological Argument”. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 1998.
RUSSELL, B. “Some Explanations in Reply to Mr. Bradley”. Mind, 19, 1910, pp. 373-378.
SPINOZA, B. “Ethics”. In: E. CURLEY (ed.), 1985. pp. 408-617.
TAYLOR, R. “Metaphysics”. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
VALLICELLA, W. F. “Relations, Monism, and the Vindication of Bradley’s Regress”.Dialectica, 56, 2002, pp. 3-35.
VAN INWAGEN, P. “An Essay on Free Will”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
______. “Metaphysics”. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2015.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”. Trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
