THE DISRUPTION OF SEYENDE – BODY,EVIL, AND FREEDOM IN SCHELLING’SSTUTTGART PRIVATE LECTURES
Palabras clave:
Schelling, Body, Evil, Freedom, Stuttgart, SeyendeResumen
The aim of this article entitled “The disruption of Seyende” is twofold. On the one hand, we intend to present to the reader for the first time Schelling’s complete conception of the body in his Stuttgart Private Lectures as an outstanding moment of his middle metaphysics dominated by the metaphysical formulation of a “higher realism” which revindicates the role of the body in human life and experience. On the other hand, we will attempt to highlight the textual and theoretical interrelationships between this Schellingian theory of the body and the broader metaphysical discussion on dualism, pluralism, and epiphenomenalism when thinking about corporeity and its relation to spirit – a discussion that for Schelling takes place under the label of the role of the real and ideal elements in the development of the system of philosophy. We will develop thus the theories of the neutral or innocent status of the body with regards to the spirit, on one hand, and of the centrality of the human spirit, in connection with the body and the soul, clarifying Schelling’s famous assertion according to which “the spirit is not the highest”, on the other. Our main anthropological thesis is that Schelling’s humanism and anthropocentrism do not entail a position of privilege and a right to domination, but, on the contrary, a supreme moral and metaphysical responsibility in the face of all created beings.
Referencias
ALDERWICK, C. “Schelling’s Ontology of Powers”. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.
BAUMGARTNER, H. M. “Von der Notwendigkeit dualer Weltbetrachtung”. In: L. Scheffczyk (ed.), 1990, pp. 185-206.
BEISER, F. C. „German Idealism. The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801.” Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.
BOWIE, A. “Schelling and modern european philosophy. An introduction.” London: Routledge, 1993.
BRACKEN, J. A. „Freiheit und Kausalität bei Schelling.“ Friburgo: K. Alber, 1972.
BRATA DAS, S. “The Political Theology of Schelling.” Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
BRUNO, A. G. (ed.). “Schelling’s Philosophy. Freedom, Nature, and Systematicity.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
CARRASCO CONDE, A. “La limpidez del mal”. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés, 2013.
FISCHBACH, F. “La pensée politique de schelling”. Les Études philosophiques, 56, 2001, pp. 31-48.
FRANK, M. “‘Identity and non-identity’: Schelling’s path to the ‘absolute system of identity’”. In: L. Ostaric (ed.), 2014, pp. 120-144.
GERLACH, S. „Handlung bei Schelling. Zur Fundamentaltheorie von Praxis, Zeit und Religion im mittleren und späten Werk“. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2019.
HEIDEGGER, M. „Gesamtausgabe“, II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919-1944, Band 42. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1988. (= GA)
HERMANNI, F. „Die letzte Entlassung. Vollendung und Scheitern des abendländischen Theodizee-proyektes in Schellings Philosophie“. Viena: Passenger Verlag, 1994.
JUSSAUME, A. “Schelling’s Metaphysics of Love”. Idealistic Studies, 48, 3, 2018, pp. 211-236.
KAIN, P. J. “Rousseau, the General Will, and Individual Liberty”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 7, 3, 1990, pp. 315-334.
KOSCH, M. “Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
LACHS, J. “Fichte’s Idealism”. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 4, 1972, pp.311-318.
LAWRENCE, J. P. “Schelling: Philosopher of tragic dissonance”. In: A. D. Schrift (ed.), 2010, pp. 163-186.LINDBERG, S. “The Remains of the Romantic Philosophy of Nature: Being as Life, or the Plurality of Living Beings?”. CR: The New Centennial Review, 10, 3, 2010, pp. 37–54.
MARQUET, J.-F. “Schelling et l’anticipation de l’éternité”. Les Études philosophiques, 2, 1981, pp. 141-153.
MCLACHLAN, J. “‘I’ve Loved You Since the Beginning of Time’: The Problem of the Person in Boehme, Schelling, Dostoevsky, Errol Flynn, and Jan Olof Bengtsson”. The Pluralist, 3, 2, 2008, pp. 81-99.
MÜLLER-LÜNESCHLOß, V. „Über das Verhältnis von Natur und Geisterwelt Ihre Trennung, ihre Versöhnung, Gott und den Menschen. Eine Studie zu F.W.J. Schellings »Stuttgarter Privatvorlesungen« (1810) nebst des Briefwechsels Wangenheim – Niederer – Schelling der Jahre 1809/1810“. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2012.
NASSAR, D. “An ‘Ethics for the Transition’ Schelling’s Critique of Negative Philosophy and Its Significance for Environmental Thought”. In: A. G. Bruno, (ed.), 2020, pp.231-248.
______. “The romantic absolute”. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
NIETZSCHE, F. W. „Kritische Studienausgabe“. G. Colli & M. Montinari, (eds.), 15 Bände. München: Walter de Gruyter, 1967-1977.
OSER, T. „Sprünge über den Horizont des Denkens. Interpretationen zum mittleren Schelling 1806-1811“. PhD Dissertation: Freie Universität Berlin, 1997.
OSTARIC. L. (ed.). “Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays”. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
PINKARD, T. “How to Move from Romanticism to Post-Romanticism: Schelling, Hegel, and Heine”. European Romantic Review, 21, 3, 2010, pp. 391–407.
RODRÍGUEZ, J. J. “A Dark Nature. Schelling on the world and freedom in the years 1806-1810.” Idealistic Studies, 52, 2, 2022, pp. 179-199.
ROHLF, M. “The Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant´s Third Critique”. Kant–studien, 99/3, 2008, pp. 338-360.
SCHEERLINCK, R. „Philosophie und Religion« – Schellings Politische Philosophie“. München: Karl Alber, 2017.
SCHEFFCZYK, L. (ed.). “Dualismus versus Dualität. Aspekte neuzeitlicher Weltbetrachtung”. Friburgo/Múnich: Alber, 1990.
SCHELLING, F. W. J. „Schellings Sämtliche Werke“, XIV Bände. Stuttgart: Cotta, 1856-1861 (= SW).
______. (1946). „Die Weltalter. Fragmente. In dem Urfassungen von 1811 und 1813“. Múnich: Beck, 1993. (= WA)
SCHOPENHAUER, A. (1819). „Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung“. Köln: Anaconda, 2009.
SCHRIFT, A. D. (ed.). “The history of continental philosophy”, Vol. 1. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2010.
SCHULZE, W. A. “Zum Verständnis der Stuttgarter Privatvorlesungen Schellings”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 11, 4, 1957, pp. 575-593.UNDERWOOD VAUGHT, A. „The Specter of Spinoza in Schelling’s Freiheitsschrift“. PhD Dissertation: Villanova University, 2011.
VETÖ, M. «De Kant à Schelling. Les deux voies de l´idéalisme allemand». 2 Vols. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon, 2000.
ZIZEK, S. (1996). “The indivisible remainder. An essay on Schelling and related matters”. Londres: Verso, 2007.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Kriterion
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
